Editorial policy & correction standards

How we create, review, and maintain original content quality. Last updated: May 26, 2026.

Purpose

WeatherRecall publishes educational weather planning content to help users make better date and location decisions. Our goal is to provide practical, original, and verifiable information that adds value beyond raw data tables.

Originality standards

We do not publish copied or lightly reworded third-party articles.
We prioritize original analysis, planning frameworks, and practical interpretation.
When external sources are used, we summarize in our own words and link to the source context.
We avoid publishing pages with little substance or pages created only to target keywords.

Source transparency

Data-backed claims should be traceable to named sources or to reproducible calculations in WeatherRecall tools.

Primary weather data references are documented in our methodology page.
Where claims are estimates or rules of thumb, they are clearly presented as planning guidance.
We distinguish between historical patterns and future forecast certainty.

Quality review checklist

Before publishing

Each page is reviewed for usefulness, clarity, source consistency, and unique value compared with existing pages on the same topic.

After publishing

Pages are re-reviewed when methodology changes, data changes materially, or users report ambiguity or factual issues.

Content consolidation

When pages overlap heavily, we merge or rewrite them to avoid duplicate and low-value page clusters.

Corrections policy

If we discover a factual error, methodological misstatement, or broken explanation, we correct it as quickly as possible and update the page timestamp when the change is substantial.

Minor language edits: no timestamp change required.
Material factual or methodological corrections: timestamp updated.
Major interpretation changes: timestamp updated and context clarified in-page.

To report an issue, email [email protected] with the page URL and a short description of the concern.

Ad and content balance

We aim to keep pages content-first. Ads should not obstruct navigation or displace primary information. We avoid layouts that prioritize promotions over the publisher content users came to read.

This aligns with Google publisher requirements around inventory value and ad experience quality.

Continuous improvement

We evaluate new content opportunities using real user needs: planning scenarios, methodology questions, and repeated support requests. We prefer fewer pages with stronger depth over many thin pages with overlapping text.